To post a comment just click on the Orange comment text under post.
We reserve the right to edit post for hostility or not post at all because it doesnt belong here.



Friday, September 21, 2012

More Sentinel reporting on our planning board members.



WINCHESTER — A planning board member’s call for three other members to resign went unheeded and mostly undiscussed Monday night.

Board member Larry Hill delivered a three-page letter to the board calling for fellow board members Brian D. Moser, Kim G. Gordon and alternate Jennifer Bellan to resign from the Winchester Planning Board and any other town boards or committees.

Calling their actions “vandalistic” and “slanderous,” Hill alleges in his letter that the three “are determined to disrupt the board and attack the integrity of the remaining board members for reasons unknown.

“Unless the disruptions, attacks and unfounded allegations stop immediately, I am very tempted to bring forth a petitioned Warrant Article to dissolve and eliminate the Planning Board.”

Hill’s letter, meant to act as a motion, was not seconded by any of the other six board members at the table, including Moser and Gordon. Only Moser responded.

“The fact that we don’t agree all the time is not (a) reason to say that people should not be on the board. A board that agrees all the time is a joke,” Moser said.

Although Hill writes he had “decided to put everything on the table,” the only actions he attributes to a specific person are to Moser and his Aug. 25 letter to the editor, which Hill calls “slanderous.”

In his letter to The Sentinel, Moser accused another member of the board, whom he didn’t name, of being “a rubber stamp for certain interests.” He also repeated comments he had overheard in a restaurant from an unnamed businessman that “those people in Winchester can be bought off with a bag of groceries.”

Hill called out Gordon for failing to recuse herself from recent deliberations over a proposed Dunkin’ Donuts, because she is a friend and walking partner of Stanley S. Plifka Jr.’s wife. Plifka, owner of Kulick’s Inc., opposed the project. The board rejected the plan and the applicant is now appealing the decision.

Gordon said this morning she and Plifka’s wife do not discuss town business, including the Dunkin’ Donuts proposal, and said there had been no reason to recuse herself during the deliberations on the proposal.

Hill accuses “an alternate” of disruptive behavior and contributing to attacks against the town land use assistant and former planning board member Margaret Sharra.

The incident he refers to occurred during the board’s July 16 meeting, when Bellan objected to being denied the right to speak while she was sitting as an audience member. She was eventually allowed to voice her concerns about the Dunkin’ Donuts project, which Hill believes was the wrong decision. Hill writes that Bellan unfairly blamed Sharra for blocking her from speaking.

Reached after the meeting, Bellan said she believes she was correct in addressing the board with her concerns.

Some of Hill’s other unattributed allegations include wearing hats in a public forum and frequently voting in the negative “even on such matters as approving the meeting minutes.”

After the meeting, Moser, still wearing the black hat he donned in the meeting, said he had voted against approving the meeting minutes since he began serving on the board, because they were not accurate. Similarly, Gordon said she had voted against approving the minutes for three years because her suggestions for changes or corrections are ignored.

Gordon, Bellan and Moser all said they would not resign. Their terms finish in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

Moser also serves on the budget committee, and Gordon is the planning board representative on the Historic District Commission.

Garrett Brnger can be reached at 352-1234, extension 1436, or gbrnger@keenesentinel.com.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

What if dozens or even hundreds of people started showing up at Planning board meetings and demanded the resignation of Kim and possibly Brian

Seems their only goal is to cause the board to no longer function.

Larry brings up the idea of a warrant article to disband the entire board, Is that possible? then how do we rebuild it?

Winchester and Ashuelot News said...

We have received a few comments that had very valid points but we are unable to post these because of hostility, name calling etc. etc.
To the authors, please edit your comments so that we may post them and get your views and opinions out there.

Thank you

Winchester and Ashuelot News said...

Anonymous said...September 21, 2012 10:06 AM

Without a doubt more people attending board meetings in our town is a good thing.
Dont know if you can demand anyone resigns, But it is a nice thought.

Anonymous said...

Food for thought
According to Wikipedia

A recall election (also called a recall referendum or representative recall) is a procedure by which voters can remove an elected official from office through a direct vote before his or her term has ended. Recalls, which are initiated when sufficient voters sign a petition, have a history dating back to the ancient Athenian democracy[1] and are a feature of several contemporary constitutions.

2011 recalls

In 2011, there were at least 150 recall elections in the United States. Of these, 75 officials were recalled, and nine officials resigned under threat of recall. Recalls were held in 17 states in 73 different jurisdictions. Michigan had the most recalls (at least 30). The year set a record for number of state legislator recall elections (11 elections) beating with previous one-year high (three elections). Three jurisdictions adopted the recall in 2011.[8]

Of recall elections, 52 were for city council, 30 were for mayor, 17 were for school board, 11 were for state legislators, one was for prosecuting attorney (York County, Nebraska). The largest municipality to hold a recall was Miami-Dade County, Florida, for mayor.[8]

I vote said...

Kim Gordon, Wasn't she the one who got voted off the PB and a letter of reprimand from the BOS after the asphalt plant deal? why is she still able to disgracing this board anymore and now she is protecting Plifka at our expense!
Here's a idea drive to Market Basket in swanzey and on your way back stop at T-Bird (must be swanzeys planning board is a little more honest)fill up the tank and get yourself a hot coffee and you will still have saved some money.
I say no more Gordon and no more Kulicks, we don't need them.

Anonymous said...

This is from the opinion page of the sentinel. Even oputsiders are confused by some of our board members.
Posted: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:15 pm | Updated: 12:10 pm, Fri Sep 21, 2012.

0 comments

What are they afraid of?

I am amazed at Winchester’s reluctance to have positive change.


They don’t want a dollar store to replace one of their many eyesores, generate tax money and provide employment.

Now, they oppose a Dunkin’ Donut business that will offer these same economic advantages.

When leaving Keene, to access points south, the experience of meandering through Winchester is an experience not suitable for aesthetic appreciation and a cause for curiosity as to why this town insists on remaining an anachronism in today’s time.

MORRIS MEDVIDOFSKY

Park Avenue

Keene

Winchester and Ashuelot News said...

Mr. MEDVIDOFSKY
Please don't take the wrong doings of some of our planning board members (in reference to D&D) or the questionable goals of our Historic district commission (The eye-soar you mentioned) as the general consensus of how the Winchester residents feel. You will find the majority of us want these things but unfortunately we have a planning board that has become dysfunctional because a few board members who no longer are doing the job they were elected to do. And as far as the eye-soar we again agree with you, It needs to go and be replaced with something attractive and useful and generate better tax revenue. Again we have a HDC who frankly doesn't know what they are doing,they have no experience in the balance between Historical and useful. Some of the members feel everything that is old is historical and historical has to be run down and ugly. The fight to keep this eye-soar sitting on main st. is more about who owns it and less about it being historically important to us.! A HDC member even made up a new name for the house that no one had ever heard before (Wheaton/Alexander house) and claim that because some doctors lived there it was historical. Experts have admitted the house has had to many additions over different times to be a historically significant building. and the work needed to save it is not worth the expense, and save it for what? another vacant building generating us no tax revenue or jobs?
Mr. MEDVIDOFSKY please don't let the actions of a very few represent the entire town. Elections are coming and hopefully change is in the air.

Ashuelot native said...

Nice to see a format that is willing to print the other side of the story, The Other site only prints comments that benefit Kim Gordon and her few friends, Gee I wonder who runs it?
The way to get peoples attention is usually through the pocketbook so if people do not agree with what Butch is trying to do boycott his stores, That will make him understand he needs to be accountable for his actions.He has run the town far to long and now has the help of Kim Gordon his friend on the planning board,she seems to have her own personal agenda and its not in the best interest of the town.

concerned citizen said...

The thing I like about this format is you tell the good news too It was nice to see the piece on the Pickle Festival and the hard work that was put in by all of the volunteers The trouble with the Winchester blog is they seem to forcus on all bad things except when it comes to patting themselves on the back especially if the information is about promotion Kim Gordon and Brian Mosher makes me think that they are the ones running the blog but I will say at least Brian has the good sense to sign his name when he is attacking someone Keep up the good work

Anonymous said...

Time for a change, Come this March lets send a loud and clear message to Miss Gordon, We are done with you, you are no longer welcome on our planning board and why don't you just pack up and move to where ever it is you came from.
The Gordon name used to be a respected name in this town, Ruth Gordon was a wonderful soul, Such a shame to see what a in-law can do to a family name.

Ashuelot Native said...

I totally agree with the poster from Sept 26th it is time for Kim to get her bags packed and end her reign of terror on the citizens of Winchester and Ashuelot. I am so glad that Ruth did not have to see what a shamble she has made out of the Gordon name. The bus is leaving Kim, why don't you get on it

concerned citizen said...

Has anyone else noticed that it seems that any board Kim Gordon is associated with seems to have nothing but desention and trouble, is she really working for the good of the people of Winchester or trying to get her name noticed Just like a little child they don;t care how they get attention as long as they are getting it I think this fits Kim Gordon to a T

watching citizen said...

I have noticed that Julia Ferria is still using her husbands government plate on her vehicle,isn;t that against the law,,,,she who holds everyone else to a high standard doesn;t seem to apply the same thing to herself Come on Julia turn in the plate